Even though the woman’s clothing is professional and appropriate for the office, she is angry after being dress-coded at her new job only 10 weeks into her place.
According to her in a TikTok, the affair has left her feeling both assaulted and unsure about why she was initially targeted.
Because her coworkers’ ladies complained about her appearance and attire, she was told she was dress-coded.
We’re in the midst of a fresh wave of Prudery that seems to have resulted in a flood of bizarre incidents of “dress- scripting” women, including children in schools, for insane supposed “violations” they’ve committed with outfits that are all too frequently anything but revealing.
For, that pitynism has come out in a truly outrageous — and potentially illegitimate — situation at her brand-new job selling expensive cars, which she relocated to consider.
It now started to go backward for reasons she and many others digitally have found remarkable after just a little over a week into the new placement.
She was ‘pulled aside’ 10 days into the work and told she made her acquaintances’ wives ‘miserable.’
In a film captured in her vehicle right after the meeting, she said, “I was pulled off now and told that women’s families were calling and saying that they are uneasy with me working there and the way I look.”
“First out, I’ve been here for 10 time”, she said petulantly. “Why are your families calling? I don’t know your spouse. I don’t care to know your spouse. How does your spouse understand what I wear to the office each day and how I look?
That’s really the end of this story. The fact that everyone took it seriously enough to create this woman’s problem is remarkable on its face. This is extremely improper.
But then Fer accidentally turned her phone back up and showed her outfit, which appeared to be a standard size, just above the knee, with a plain white cap-sleeved dress. “I don’t think it’s inappropriate what I’m wearing,” she said. “I think it’s good.” She continued, adding that she has never had issues wearing the costume and similar clothing to previous jobs.
She suspects her “curvier” number is the foundation for the issues, and it’s left her extremely unpleasant.
Fer explained that she thinks “the right way” and that’s why she was reprimanded. Her employer didn’t say this of course: “I got told that I am better off wearing a polo and slacks”, she said.
But she was left slack-jawed by the courage of people involved, which makes her considering never returning to her job. “That is so uncomfortable to be told — like your spouse and your wife are calling in and saying they don’t like me,” you ask? That expletive just made me so nervous. Take your blouses and shove them up your “Take your jeans and take your blouses.”
People were suspicious that it wasn’t truly the families complaining, and the lady agreed.
Many people in Fer’s video believed it was evident someone was bringing their marital issues to her office, despite the fact that almost all of the viewers were on her side. “That cries’ we have problems at home,'” one person commented.
But people had a unique idea. They believed it to be a form of damage, which was unmistakable. “Nothing called”, one person wrote. Guaranteed that the person who spoke to you has the issue or is friends with another seller who believes you will generate more business.
In a follow-up video, Fer claimed she was the only one who “singled out” and that there was likely more to the story than what appeared to be because “other people show more cleavage than I do.”
In the end, she did choose to go back to work, but the incident left her “very restless” and uncomfortable. When my brain was raised, I felt like I was being sexualized, she said. But she’s refusing to allow them “run me out”, and while she has covered up more, she’s refusing to use the shirt and jeans they demanded.
Aleksei Isachenko photos / Canva Pro
She was urged to document problems or perhaps hire a lawyer. Firstly because the woman who “pulled her aside” wasn’t even a manager but merely a colleague who was told to go have the conversation, a wild breach of office ethics.
More important, this is possible all illegitimate. The EEOC defines as “unwelcome do” based on a person’s status as a protected class that becomes possibly “a condition of employment” or so “serious or ubiquitous” that it creates an “intimidating, hostile, or aggressive” environment.
Being singled out and made to feel “very restless” and “uneasy” fits the bill, and Fer is best not to have for it. Hopefully her company understands before hiring an attorney to do it for them.